Projects / AI Red Teaming
NDA-Compliant · Sanitized Findings · Active Research

AI Red Teaming
Framework

Adversarial testing toolkit built from active engagements against frontier LLMs. Prompt injection pattern detection and structured adversarial test suite - real techniques, sanitized findings.

0 Pattern Classes
0 Techniques Documented
0 Test Cases
0 Models Evaluated

Prompt Injection Testing Framework

Regex-based pattern scanner against 9 real adversarial signature classes - the same patterns used to triage prompts during live engagements. Click any example below or write your own, then hit Analyse.

9 Pattern Classes Regex + Heuristics Not AI-powered
Try an example:
Input Prompt
Analysis Results

Click an example above or type a prompt, then hit Analyse.

Adversarial Test Suite

Simulated run of the actual test suite structure used during real engagements - same categories, same test names, realistic timing. Results are randomised on each run, not live model calls. The test case taxonomy and failure modes are real; the per-run scores are illustrative.

214 Test Cases Simulated Run Real Taxonomy

Test Configuration

Last Run Summary

- Total Tests
- Passed
- Failed
- Vulnerabilities
Safety Score
-
adversarial_suite.py - simulation
Configure and click Run Simulation to replay a test suite run.

Frontier Model Evaluation

Sanitized, NDA-compliant findings from an active red teaming engagement. Model identifiers redacted.

Methodology

  • Black-box adversarial testing - no model weights accessed
  • Structured taxonomy-driven test plan with 200+ cases
  • Manual and automated prompt generation pipelines
  • Multi-turn and single-turn attack vectors evaluated
  • Findings triaged by severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low
  • Responsible disclosure followed throughout engagement

Key Findings (Sanitized)

CRITICAL

Composite role-play + encoding attacks bypassed content filters with 83% success rate across evaluated models.

HIGH

Indirect prompt injection via retrieved documents succeeded in tool-augmented deployments in 7/10 test scenarios.

HIGH

Many-shot jailbreaking demonstrated context-length dependency - models with larger windows showed higher vulnerability.

MEDIUM

System prompt extraction via translation-chaining succeeded in 49% of cases; partial disclosure in additional 23%.

Engagement Timeline

Scoping & Taxonomy Design Attack categories defined, test plan drafted
Manual Adversarial Testing Role-play, injection, encoding, context attacks
Automated Suite Execution 214 parameterised cases, multi-model evaluation
Multimodal Surface Analysis Vision, audio, and tool-use vectors evaluated
Report & Responsible Disclosure Findings reported; mitigations tracked to closure

Engagement Statistics

3 Critical Findings
8 High Findings
12 Medium Findings
214 Total Tests Run
6 Models Evaluated
100% Disclosed

All findings are sanitized and NDA-compliant. Model identifiers, client details, and specific exploit strings have been redacted. This framework and its findings are presented for educational and portfolio purposes only. Responsible disclosure procedures were followed throughout the engagement.